Businesses frequently misunderstand what a gap analysis actually means, treating findings as a pass/fail compliance judgment rather than a roadmap for improvement.

 

Common issues include vague or missing procedures, unclear ownership of risks and controls, absence of defined KPIs, incomplete registers, poor evidence of document control, lack of measurement traceability and weak linkage between internal workflows and the audited clauses.

 

Many findings remain open due to teams feeling overwhelmed, lacking prioritisation, or not knowing how to convert observations into corrective actions.

 

Suppliers show as “approved” with no screening evidence, stakeholder needs are not evaluated and unintended contamination or OHS risks are assumed controlled but not verified. The result is audit fatigue, stalled action items and persistent non-compliance risks.

​

We help close these gaps by translating findings into sequenced, risk-ranked actions with clear owners, deadlines and measurable evidence requirements.  We streamline or build missing procedures in line with ISO and relevant codes, then embed them into operations. By coaching teams to score, validate evidence and implement controls, we convert ambiguity into defendable audit records — closing gaps and preventing recurrence.

​

Own the system. Improve the process. Protect the product.